首页> 外文OA文献 >Abnormal ductus venosus pulsatility index in the absence of concurrent umbilical venous pulsations does not indicate worsening fetal condition.
【2h】

Abnormal ductus venosus pulsatility index in the absence of concurrent umbilical venous pulsations does not indicate worsening fetal condition.

机译:在没有并发的脐静脉搏动的情况下,异常的静脉导管脉动指数并不表示胎儿状况恶化。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Recordings of blood flow velocity waveform in the ductus venosus (DV) and the umbilical vein (UV) are routinely used in order to predict the fetal condition in high-risk pregnancies. This study investigates the relationship between pathological blood flow in the two vessels and perinatal outcome. METHODS: High-risk pregnancies (n=11865) admitted during 1993-2011 for blood flow examinations, including recordings of DV pulsatility index for veins (PIV) and UV pulsations, were included. The results were related to perinatal outcome, using the last Doppler examination prior to delivery in analysis. RESULTS: Abnormal DV PIV was observed in 3,96%, intra-abdominal UV-pulsations in 1,3% and pulsations in the cord in 0,7% of the cases. As expected, the rate of UV-pulsations increased with increasing DV PIV z-score. Fetuses with a pathological DV PIV, but without UV pulsations showed no signs of compromise. This was also true for cases with a DV PIV >4 SD above the mean (53.7 % had a steady flow in the UV). In contrast, the occurrence of UV-pulsations seems to be an indicator of fetal compromise regardless of level of DV PIV. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal fetal venous blood velocity is related to adverse outcome of high-risk pregnancies. However, abnormal DV PIV is not an indicator of fetal compromise unless UV-pulsations are concurrently present and should be regarded as an artifact and not an indication for emergency delivery.
机译:目的:常规地记录静脉导管(DV)和脐静脉(UV)中的血流速度波形,以预测高危妊娠中的胎儿状况。这项研究调查了两条血管的病理性血流与围产期结局之间的关系。方法:纳入1993年至2011年期间进行血流检查的高危妊娠(n = 11865),包括记录静脉的DV脉动指数(PIV)和紫外线脉动。结果与围产期结局有关,使用分娩前的最后一次多普勒检查进行分析。结果:在这些病例中,DV PIV异常的发生率为3.96%,腹腔内紫外线波动的发生率为1.3%,脐带脉动的发生率为0.7%。如预期的那样,紫外线脉动的速率随着DV PIV z分数的增加而增加。具有病理性DV PIV,但无紫外线脉动的胎儿无损害迹象。 DV PIV> 4 SD高于平均值(53.7%的紫外线稳定流动)的情况也是如此。相反,无论DV PIV的水平如何,紫外线脉冲的出现似乎都是胎儿妥协的指标。结论:胎儿静脉血流速度异常与高危妊娠的不良后果有关。但是,除非同时存在紫外线脉冲,否则异常的DV PIV并不是胎儿危害的指标,应将其视为伪影,而不是紧急分娩的指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号